State v. Maddocks

56 P.3d 463, 184 Or. App. 390, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1622
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 16, 2002
DocketMC 020001; A117221
StatusPublished

This text of 56 P.3d 463 (State v. Maddocks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Maddocks, 56 P.3d 463, 184 Or. App. 390, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1622 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from a judgment continuing his commitment to the Mental Health Division. The state concedes that the record does not demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that appellant currently meets the criteria for “mentally ill” set forth in ORS 426.005. We agree and therefore accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 P.3d 463, 184 Or. App. 390, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maddocks-orctapp-2002.