State v. Maddocks
56 P.3d 463, 184 Or. App. 390, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1622
Opinion
Appellant appeals from a judgment continuing his commitment to the Mental Health Division. The state concedes that the record does not demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that appellant currently meets the criteria for “mentally ill” set forth in ORS 426.005. We agree and therefore accept the state’s concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Maddocks, 56 P.3d 463, 184 Or. App. 390, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1622 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).
56 P.3d 463 (State v. Maddocks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005