Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. MacPherson

State v. MacPherson

950 P.2d 417, 151 Or. App. 702, 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1886
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 17, 1997
Docket95-06-35979; CA A91887
StatusPublished

This text of 950 P.2d 417 (State v. MacPherson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. MacPherson, 950 P.2d 417, 151 Or. App. 702, 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1886 (Or. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her of two counts each of manufacture, delivery and possession of a controlled substance. She raises four assignments of error.

On the same record now before us, identical issues of fact and law were raised and decided in a codefendant’s case, State v. Wright, 150 Or App 159, 945 P2d 1083 (1997). We resolve them in the same manner in this case.

Remanded for entry of an amended judgment, merging the conviction in counts 1 and 2, counts 3 and 4, and counts 5 and 6, and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wright
945 P.2d 1083 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
950 P.2d 417, 151 Or. App. 702, 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-macpherson-orctapp-1997.