State v. MacMillan

671 So. 2d 893, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4050, 1996 WL 185669
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 19, 1996
DocketNo. 95-447
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 671 So. 2d 893 (State v. MacMillan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. MacMillan, 671 So. 2d 893, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4050, 1996 WL 185669 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence. Because the judge departed downwards from [894]*894the sentencing guidelines without giving written reasons we must reverse. State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991); Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990). Because there was no evidentiary basis for the departure we also reverse. Because there was no proper guideline scoresheet used by the judge the sentencing proceedings were fatally flawed from the outset. The only fair and proper way to correct the situation is to vacate the purported sentence and remand to the trial court for a proper sentencing hearing where both sides can present what evidence they deem necessary and a correct guideline scoresheet is used. If the sentencing judge again decides to depart then the sentencing document must have on it the written reasons, which should be legally recognized valid ones.

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perry v. State
767 So. 2d 1282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
State v. Osborn
717 So. 2d 1110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 So. 2d 893, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4050, 1996 WL 185669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-macmillan-fladistctapp-1996.