State v. Mack

Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided September 2, 2015·No. 2015-UP-449·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent, v. Brian Curtis Mack, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2013-001726

Appeal From Lexington County Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-449 Submitted May 1, 2015 – Filed September 2, 2015

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Mary Williams Leddon, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. McKinney, 278 S.C. 107, 108, 292 S.E.2d 598, 599 (1982)

(holding the failure to object to the involuntary or unknowing nature of a guilty plea precludes consideration of the issue on appeal).

AFFIRMED.1 FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mack, (S.C. Ct. App. 2015).

State v. Mack (State v. Mack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McKinney
292 S.E.2d 598 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1982)