State v. Mack

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedSeptember 2, 2015
Docket2015-UP-449
StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Mack (State v. Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Mack, (S.C. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Brian Curtis Mack, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001726

Appeal From Lexington County Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-449 Submitted May 1, 2015 – Filed September 2, 2015

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Mary Williams Leddon, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. McKinney, 278 S.C. 107, 108, 292 S.E.2d 598, 599 (1982) (holding the failure to object to the involuntary or unknowing nature of a guilty plea precludes consideration of the issue on appeal).

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. McKinney
292 S.E.2d 598 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Mack, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mack-scctapp-2015.