State v. MacFarland
This text of 58 A.2d 106 (State v. MacFarland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment below is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the Supreme Court.
The alleged fatal variance between the proof and the indictment and the impropriety of certain questions to the plaintiff in error in reference to his knowledge concerning R. S. 40:25-2 were not assigned as the basis for reversal in the assignments of error and the causes for reversal filed below. The Supreme Court therefore did not decide or pass upon the questions and they cannot be presented or considered in this court. State v. Lavieri, 93 N. J. L. 201.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, Wachenfeld, Burling, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 A.2d 106, 136 N.J.L. 543, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-macfarland-nj-1948.