State v. Mace
This text of 543 A.2d 835 (State v. Mace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Ervin E. Mace appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court, Kennebec County, on a jury verdict finding him guilty of unlawful sexual contact, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp.1987). Contrary to Mace’s contentions, the indictment’s allegation that he “intentionally or knowingly ” subjected the victim to sexual contact did not render the indictment (later amended to strike “or knowingly”) insufficient for failing to charge the state of mind element of the offense, State v. Thornton, 540 A.2d 773, 775-76 (Me.1988); and viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the jury rationally could find beyond a reasonable doubt all the elements of the offense charged, State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
543 A.2d 835, 1988 Me. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mace-me-1988.