State v. Mace

543 A.2d 835, 1988 Me. LEXIS 184
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 7, 1988·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Ervin E. Mace appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court, Kennebec County, on a jury verdict finding him guilty of unlawful sexual contact, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp.1987). Contrary to Mace’s contentions, the indictment’s allegation that he “intentionally or knowingly ” subjected the victim to sexual contact did not render the indictment (later amended to strike “or knowingly”) insufficient for failing to charge the state of mind element of the offense, State v. Thornton, 540 A.2d 773, 775-76 (Me.1988); and viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the jury rationally could find beyond a reasonable doubt all the elements of the offense charged, State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mace, 543 A.2d 835, 1988 Me. LEXIS 184 (Me. 1988).

543 A.2d 835 (State v. Mace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Thornton
540 A.2d 773 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1988)
State v. Barry
495 A.2d 825 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)