State v. M. Z.
150 P.3d 1069, 210 Or. App. 456, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 11
Opinion
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence in the record is insufficient to establish that he is presently a danger to himself or others because of a mental disorder. ORS 426.130. The state concedes that the evidence does not establish the grounds for the order of commitment that was entered in this case. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. M. Z., 150 P.3d 1069, 210 Or. App. 456, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 11 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
150 P.3d 1069 (State v. M. Z.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130