State v. M. Z.
150 P.3d 1069, 210 Or. App. 456, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 11
This text of 150 P.3d 1069 (State v. M. Z.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. M. Z., 150 P.3d 1069, 210 Or. App. 456, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 11 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
Opinion
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence in the record is insufficient to establish that he is presently a danger to himself or others because of a mental disorder. ORS 426.130. The state concedes that the evidence does not establish the grounds for the order of commitment that was entered in this case. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
150 P.3d 1069, 210 Or. App. 456, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-m-z-orctapp-2007.