State v. M. V.
This text of 195 P.3d 912 (State v. M. V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that, at the time of the civil commitment hearing, she met the statutory definition of a “mentally ill person” who suffers from a mental disorder that causes her to be unable to meet her basic needs, ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the record lacks such clear and convincing evidence. On de novo review, State v. Miller, 198 Or App 153, 155, 107 P3d 683 (2005), we agree that the evidence is legally insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 P.3d 912, 223 Or. App. 256, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-m-v-orctapp-2008.