State v. M. S. D. (In re M. S. D.)

445 P.3d 950, 298 Or. App. 831
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 7, 2019·No. A169699·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*832Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division for a period of up to 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the trial court erred because the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a "person with mental illness." ORS 426.005(1)(f) ; ORS 426.130(1)(a)(C). The state concedes that the evidence in the record does not meet the legal standard for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. M. S. D. (In re M. S. D.), 445 P.3d 950, 298 Or. App. 831 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).

445 P.3d 950 (State v. M. S. D. (In re M. S. D.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005