State v. M. R. G.
228 P.3d 720, 234 Or. App. 592, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 288
Opinion
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that she suffers from a mental disorder and that, because of that disorder, she is unable to provide for her own basic needs. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that appellant is unable to provide for her basic needs because of a mental disorder. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient to support an order of civil commitment.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. M. R. G., 228 P.3d 720, 234 Or. App. 592, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
228 P.3d 720 (State v. M. R. G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Mrg
228 P.3d 720 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)