State v. M. R. G.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. M. R. G.

228 P.3d 720, 234 Or. App. 592, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 288

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 31, 2010

Docket071171721; A142348

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 228 P.3d 720 (State v. M. R. G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. M. R. G., 228 P.3d 720, 234 Or. App. 592, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that she suffers from a mental disorder and that, because of that disorder, she is unable to provide for her own basic needs. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that appellant is unable to provide for her basic needs because of a mental disorder. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient to support an order of civil commitment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that she suffers from a mental disorder and that, because of that disorder, she is unable to provide for her own basic needs. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that appellant is unable to provide for her basic needs because of a mental disorder. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient to support an order of civil commitment.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 P.3d 720, 234 Or. App. 592, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-m-r-g-orctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack