State v. M. P.

Wasco County Circuit Court, Oregon

State v. M. P.

379 P.3d 843, 279 Or. App. 172

CourtWasco County Circuit Court, Oregon

DecidedJune 22, 2016

Docket1400017MC; A158655

StatusPublished

This text of 379 P.3d 843 (State v. M. P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wasco County Circuit Court, Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. M. P., 379 P.3d 843, 279 Or. App. 172 (Or. Super. Ct. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals an order committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in concluding that, as a result of a mental disorder, she is a danger to herself. See ORS 426.005(l)(f). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. We agree and accept the state’s concession.¹

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals an order committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in concluding that, as a result of a mental disorder, she is a danger to herself. See ORS 426.005(l)(f). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. We agree and accept the state’s concession.¹

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

379 P.3d 843, 279 Or. App. 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-m-p-orccwasco-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack