State v. M. K.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. M. K.

280 P.3d 1064, 250 Or. App. 564, 2012 WL 2344451, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 776

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJune 20, 2012

Docket110869554; A149614

StatusPublished

This text of 280 P.3d 1064 (State v. M. K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. M. K., 280 P.3d 1064, 250 Or. App. 564, 2012 WL 2344451, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 776 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant was committed as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to meet her own basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support an order of involuntary commitment. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant was committed as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to meet her own basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support an order of involuntary commitment. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 P.3d 1064, 250 Or. App. 564, 2012 WL 2344451, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-m-k-orctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack