State v. M. K.
280 P.3d 1064, 250 Or. App. 564, 2012 WL 2344451, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 776
Opinion
Appellant was committed as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to meet her own basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support an order of involuntary commitment. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. M. K., 280 P.3d 1064, 250 Or. App. 564, 2012 WL 2344451, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 776 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
280 P.3d 1064 (State v. M. K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.