State v. M. J. R.

328 P.3d 823, 263 Or. App. 564
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 11, 2014·No. 13CC00712; A155832·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this appeal, appellant seeks reversal of an order committing her for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends, in an unpreserved assignment of error, that the trial court erred in failing to inform her of her right to subpoena witnesses as required by ORS 426.100(1)(d). The state concedes the error, and we agree that that failure constitutes plain error. We further conclude, for the reasons articulated in State v. M. L. R., 256 Or App 566, 570-71, 303 P3d 954 (2013), that it is appropriate to exercise our discretion to correct the error.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. M. J. R., 328 P.3d 823, 263 Or. App. 564 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).

328 P.3d 823 (State v. M. J. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. M. L. R.
303 P.3d 954 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2013)