State v. M. J. R.
This text of 328 P.3d 823 (State v. M. J. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal, appellant seeks reversal of an order committing her for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She contends, in an unpreserved assignment of error, that the trial court erred in failing to inform her of her right to subpoena witnesses as required by ORS 426.100(1)(d). The state concedes the error, and we agree that that failure constitutes plain error. We further conclude, for the reasons articulated in State v. M. L. R., 256 Or App 566, 570-71, 303 P3d 954 (2013), that it is appropriate to exercise our discretion to correct the error.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
328 P.3d 823, 263 Or. App. 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-m-j-r-orctapp-2014.