State v. M. J.
291 P.3d 774, 253 Or. App. 549
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 15, 2012·No. 120463471; A151237·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends that the trial court erred in concluding that he is a danger to others as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. M. J., 291 P.3d 774, 253 Or. App. 549 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
291 P.3d 774 (State v. M. J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Garza
291 P.3d 774 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2012)