State v. M. J.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. M. J.

291 P.3d 774, 253 Or. App. 549

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 15, 2012

Docket120463471; A151237

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 P.3d 774 (State v. M. J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. M. J., 291 P.3d 774, 253 Or. App. 549 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends that the trial court erred in concluding that he is a danger to others as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends that the trial court erred in concluding that he is a danger to others as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 P.3d 774, 253 Or. App. 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-m-j-orctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack