State v. M. B.
280 P.3d 401, 250 Or. App. 390, 2012 WL 2029759, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 731
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues, among other contentions, that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her own basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. M. B., 280 P.3d 401, 250 Or. App. 390, 2012 WL 2029759, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 731 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
280 P.3d 401 (State v. M. B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.