State v. M. A. C.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. M. A. C.

344 P.3d 512, 269 Or. App. 250

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 19, 2015

Docket14CC02253; A157964

StatusPublished

This text of 344 P.3d 512 (State v. M. A. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. M. A. C., 344 P.3d 512, 269 Or. App. 250 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He argues that the state failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to others. ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He argues that the state failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to others. ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

344 P.3d 512, 269 Or. App. 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-m-a-c-orctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack