State v. Lyons
122 A. 758, 99 N.J.L. 301, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 213
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ci-iief Justice, Trenci-iard, Parker, Minturn, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Lyons, 122 A. 758, 99 N.J.L. 301, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 213 (N.J. 1923).
122 A. 758 (State v. Lyons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Engel
592 A.2d 572 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1991)
State v. Novembrino
519 A.2d 820 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1987)
State v. MacRi
188 A.2d 389 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1963)
Eleuteri v. Richman
135 A.2d 191 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
In Re 301-317 Clinton Avenue
113 A.2d 208 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
State v. Pinsky
70 A.2d 182 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
State v. Guida
192 A. 445 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
State v. Bodner
162 A. 186 (Essex County Court of Quarter Sessions of New Jersey, 1932)
State v. Court of the First Criminal Judicial District
160 A. 672 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1932)
State v. Owens
259 S.W. 100 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1924)