State v. Lynch

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Lynch

2012 Ohio 5730, 983 N.E.2d 1314, 134 Ohio St. 3d 561

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 6, 2012

Docket2012-1361

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 2012 Ohio 5730 (State v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lynch, 2012 Ohio 5730, 983 N.E.2d 1314, 134 Ohio St. 3d 561 (Ohio 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Billiter, 134 Ohio St.3d 103, 2012-Ohio-5144, 980 N.E.2d 960, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion in State v. Billiter.

O’Connoe, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in their separate opinions in State v. Billiter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Billiter, 134 Ohio St.3d 103, 2012-Ohio-5144, 980 N.E.2d 960, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion in State v. Billiter.

O’Connoe, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in their separate opinions in State v. Billiter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2012 Ohio 5730, 983 N.E.2d 1314, 134 Ohio St. 3d 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lynch-ohio-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack