State v. Lyles

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Lyles

DecidedApril 11, 2008

Docket2008-UP-223

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Lyles (State v. Lyles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lyles, (S.C. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Clifton Lyles, Appellant.

Appeal From York County
Roger L. Couch , Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-223
Submitted April 1, 2008 Filed April 11, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Clifton Lyles appeals his conviction and sentence for trafficking crack cocaine, arguing the trial court erred by admitting his involuntary statement. Lyles also asserts numerous pro se arguments. After a thorough review of the record, counsels brief, and Lyles pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Lyles appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI