State v. Luttrell
37 S.W. 1132, 136 Mo. 25, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 294
Opinion
The defendant was indicted and convicted in Ozark county for abducting the daughter of William Aden for the purpose of concubinage. He has saved no exceptions to the action of the court in overruling his motions for new trial and in arrest, and consequently we have only the record proper before us for review. We find no error in the record proper and the judgment of the circuit court must be and is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Luttrell, 37 S.W. 1132, 136 Mo. 25, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 294 (Mo. 1896).
37 S.W. 1132 (State v. Luttrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reed v. Moss
167 S.W. 523 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1914)
Wilbrandt v. Laclede Gas Light Co.
115 S.W. 497 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1909)
State v. Blakely
115 S.W. 483 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1909)