State v. Luttrell

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Luttrell

37 S.W. 1132, 136 Mo. 25, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 294

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedNovember 20, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 37 S.W. 1132 (State v. Luttrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Luttrell, 37 S.W. 1132, 136 Mo. 25, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 294 (Mo. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Gantt, P. J.

The defendant was indicted and convicted in Ozark county for abducting the daughter of William Aden for the purpose of concubinage. He has saved no exceptions to the action of the court in overruling his motions for new trial and in arrest, and consequently we have only the record proper before us for review. We find no error in the record proper and the judgment of the circuit court must be and is affirmed.

Sherwood and Burgess, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gantt, P. J.

The defendant was indicted and convicted in Ozark county for abducting the daughter of William Aden for the purpose of concubinage. He has saved no exceptions to the action of the court in overruling his motions for new trial and in arrest, and consequently we have only the record proper before us for review. We find no error in the record proper and the judgment of the circuit court must be and is affirmed.

Sherwood and Burgess, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 S.W. 1132, 136 Mo. 25, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-luttrell-mo-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack