State v. LUSS

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. LUSS

334 S.W.3d 547, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1701, 2010 WL 5083003

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 14, 2010·No. ED 94337·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of the Class A felony of trafficking in the second degree, in violation of section 195.223.3(2) RSMo (2000). The trial court found him to be a prior and persistent *548 drug offender and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of the Class A felony of trafficking in the second degree, in violation of section 195.223.3(2) RSMo (2000). The trial court found him to be a prior and persistent *548 drug offender and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. LUSS, 334 S.W.3d 547, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1701, 2010 WL 5083003 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

334 S.W.3d 547 (State v. LUSS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related