State v. Lusane

2018 Ohio 2268

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Lusane, 2018-Ohio-2268.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO

STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2017-P-0099 - vs - :

MATTHEW M. LUSANE, :

Defendant-Appellant. :

Criminal Appeal from the Portage County Municipal Court, Kent Division, Case No. 2005 TRC 4525 K.

Judgment: Appeal dismissed.

Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, and Pamela J. Holder, Assistant Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Matthew M. Lusane, pro se, PID: A660-925, Trumbull Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 640, 5701 Burnett Road, Leavittsburg, OH 44430 (Defendant-Appellant).

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J.

{¶1} On December 27, 2017, appellant, Matthew M. Lusane, filed a pro se

motion for leave to file a delayed appeal and a notice of appeal. Appellant appeals his

December 6, 2005 conviction for OVI. The appeal is untimely by almost 12 years.

{¶2} No brief or response opposing the motion for leave has been filed. {¶3} “* * * [A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its

entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.”

App.R. 4(A)(1).

{¶4} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A)

for the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant

with leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

{¶5} “(a) Criminal proceedings;

{¶6} “(b) Delinquency proceedings; and

{¶7} “(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings.

{¶8} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals

and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of

right. Concurrently with the filing of the motion, the movant shall file with the clerk of the

trial court a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by App.R. 3 and shall file a copy of

the notice of the appeal in the court of appeals.” App.R. 5(A).

{¶9} As reasons for failing to file his appeal in a timely fashion, appellant

indicates that he was never advised of his appellate rights, including his right to court

appointed counsel to file a direct appeal.

{¶10} Accepting appellant’s statements are true, by waiting nearly 12 years

since his conviction, clearly appellant was not diligent in protecting his appellate rights.

During that time, appellant filed multiple appeals with this court, i.e. 2011-P-0040, 2014-

P-0057, 2016-P-0009, 2016-P-0036, 2017-P-0005, 2017-P-0013, 2017-P-0066, and

numerous pleadings with the trial court in this case and in other Portage County

2 Municipal Court cases. Thus, it is evident that appellant is aware of the appellate

process and procedure.

{¶11} Accordingly, appellant’s motion for leave to file a delayed appeal is hereby

overruled.

{¶12} Appeal dismissed.

TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J., concurs,

COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J., dissents with a Dissenting Opinion.

____________________

COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J., dissents with a Dissenting Opinion.

{¶13} I respectfully dissent with the majority’s position denying appellant’s

motion for a delayed appeal based on my dissenting opinions in similar matters

involving App.R. 5(A). State v. Christopher, 11th Dist. Portage Nos. 2013-P-0003,

2013-P-0004, and 2013-P-0005, 2013-Ohio-1946, ¶14–22; State v. Grant, 11th Dist.

Lake No. 2013-L-101, 2014-Ohio-5378, ¶16–25; State v. Gibbs, 11th Dist. Geauga No.

2014-G-3201, 2014-Ohio-5772, ¶16-25; State v. Funk, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2014-L-094,

2015-Ohio-813, ¶16–24; State v. Fernandez, 11th Dist. Trumbull No. 2017-T-0058,

2017-Ohio-7968, ¶9.