State v. Lundy
This text of 542 S.E.2d 651 (State v. Lundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Michael Leonard LUNDY and Ronald Lee Evans.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
John F. Oates, Jr., Raleigh, for Lundy.
Karl E. Knudsen, Raleigh, for Evans.
Robert T. Hargett, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.
Prior report: 135 N.C.App. 13, 519 S.E.2d 73.
*652 ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant (Lundy) in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2000."
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (Lundy) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2000."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
542 S.E.2d 651, 351 N.C. 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lundy-nc-2000.