State v. Lundgren

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Lundgren

852 N.E.2d 1216, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1469

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 24, 2006·No. 1993-2179·Published

Opinion

Lake App. No. 90-L-15140. This cause came on for further consideration upon appellee’s motion to set an execution date. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to set an execution date is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden on Tuesday, the 10th day of October, 2006, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that said Warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for Lake County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake App. No. 90-L-15140. This cause came on for further consideration upon appellee’s motion to set an execution date. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to set an execution date is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden on Tuesday, the 10th day of October, 2006, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that said Warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for Lake County.

State v. Lundgren, 852 N.E.2d 1216, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1469 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

852 N.E.2d 1216 (State v. Lundgren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.