State v. Lund

919 So. 2d 503, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18787, 2005 WL 3182148
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2005·No. No. 3D05-1272·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals a downward departure sentence. The trial court sentenced the defendant to 366 days as a habitual violent felony offender with credit for time served. The State objected on the ground that the sentence fell below the sentencing guidelines. We reverse because the downward departure sentence was not supported by any written reasons, and the oral reasons given were legally insufficient. See § 921.0026, Fla. Stat. (2003); State v. Perez, 802 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for the trial court to resentence the defendant, or allow the defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea and proceed to trial. State v. Meyers, 708 So.2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Sentence vacated, reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lund, 919 So. 2d 503, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18787, 2005 WL 3182148 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

919 So. 2d 503 (State v. Lund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Meyers
708 So. 2d 661 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Perez
802 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)