State v. Lund

919 So. 2d 503, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18787, 2005 WL 3182148
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 30, 2005
DocketNo. 3D05-1272
StatusPublished

This text of 919 So. 2d 503 (State v. Lund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lund, 919 So. 2d 503, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18787, 2005 WL 3182148 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals a downward departure sentence. The trial court sentenced the defendant to 366 days as a habitual violent felony offender with credit for time served. The State objected on the ground that the sentence fell below the sentencing guidelines. We reverse because the downward departure sentence was not supported by any written reasons, and the oral reasons given were legally insufficient. See § 921.0026, Fla. Stat. (2003); State v. Perez, 802 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for the trial court to resentence the defendant, or allow the defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea and proceed to trial. State v. Meyers, 708 So.2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Sentence vacated, reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Meyers
708 So. 2d 661 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Perez
802 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
919 So. 2d 503, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18787, 2005 WL 3182148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lund-fladistctapp-2005.