State v. Luna
This text of 2010 Ohio 2694 (State v. Luna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed to the extent that the court of appeals held that the trial court could impose court costs in the sentencing entry when the defendant had not been informed at the sentencing hearing that those costs would be imposed as part of his sentence on the authority of State v. Joseph, 125 Ohio St.3d 76, 2010-Ohio-954, 926 N.E.2d 278, *54 and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with State v. Joseph.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2010 Ohio 2694, 126 Ohio St. 3d 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-luna-ohio-2010.