State v. Luna

2010 Ohio 2694, 126 Ohio St. 3d 53
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 17, 2010·No. 2009-1414·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed to the extent that the court of appeals held that the trial court could impose court costs in the sentencing entry when the defendant had not been informed at the sentencing hearing that those costs would be imposed as part of his sentence on the authority of State v. Joseph, 125 Ohio St.3d 76, 2010-Ohio-954, 926 N.E.2d 278, *54 and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with State v. Joseph.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lisa Reitz Williamson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and David M. King, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Luna, 2010 Ohio 2694, 126 Ohio St. 3d 53 (Ohio 2010).

2010 Ohio 2694 (State v. Luna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Joseph
2010 Ohio 954 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)