Home/New Mexico Court of Appeals/State v. Luna

State v. Luna

442 P.2d 797, 79 N.M. 307
CourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 14, 1968
Docket124
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 442 P.2d 797 (State v. Luna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Luna, 442 P.2d 797, 79 N.M. 307 (N.M. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Appealing from a denial of post conviction relief, defendant contends that he is entitled to • credit on his sentence for time spent in presentence confinement. He relies on Sec. 40A-29-25,- NMSA 1953 (Supp. 1967), which provides for such a credit.

Defendant’s' presenterice confinement time 'occurred prior to the effective date of Sec. 40A-29-25, supra. Sec. 40Á-29-25 is not to be given retroactive effect. State v. Sedillo (Ct.App.), 79 N.M. 289, 442 P.2d 601, decided May 24, 1968. State v. Padilla, 78 N.M. 702, 437 P.2d 163 (Ct.App.1968); see State v. Sedillo, 79 N.M. 9, 439 P.2d 226 (1968).

The Order denying relief is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

SPIESS, C. J., and OMAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Young
32 Cal. App. 3d 68 (California Court of Appeal, 1973)
State v. Mears
449 P.2d 85 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1968)
State v. Chavez
449 P.2d 343 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1968)
State v. Dalrymple
448 P.2d 182 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
442 P.2d 797, 79 N.M. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-luna-nmctapp-1968.