State v. Lumpkin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Lumpkin

428 So. 2d 711, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20268

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 8, 1983

DocketNo. 82-1238

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 428 So. 2d 711 (State v. Lumpkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lumpkin, 428 So. 2d 711, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20268 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the trial court granting appellee Richard Lumpkin’s motion to suppress since it is apparent from this record that following his concededly valid arrest there was ample probable cause for the police search of the vehicle in question.¹ See United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 102 S.Ct. 2157, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982).

Appellee Herbert L. Tuff has confessed error in this cause, and thus we likewise reverse as to him.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the trial court granting appellee Richard Lumpkin’s motion to suppress since it is apparent from this record that following his concededly valid arrest there was ample probable cause for the police search of the vehicle in question.¹ See United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 102 S.Ct. 2157, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982).

Appellee Herbert L. Tuff has confessed error in this cause, and thus we likewise reverse as to him.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

428 So. 2d 711, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lumpkin-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack