State v. . Lumbrick

4 N.C. 156
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1814
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 N.C. 156 (State v. . Lumbrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Lumbrick, 4 N.C. 156 (N.C. 1814).

Opinion

The act of 1777, ch. 2, organizing the Superior and county courts, gave to the latter jurisdiction of this offense; and the section by which it is conferred concludes with these words, "and other misdemeanors of what nature or kind soever, of an inferior nature." If the words of "an inferior nature" had, prior to this act, a certain and definite meaning, it is admitted that the mode of using them here would not have changed it. But, as no such precise meaning was attached to them, we know of no more certain rule than the one contained in (157) the act. It gives to the Superior Court jurisdiction over all offenses affecting life, limb, or member, and to the inferior courts jurisdiction over all petty larcenies, assaults and battery, etc., and other misdemeanors of an inferior nature. The act since passed, declaring in what cases the State shall be liable for costs, does not affect this case, for it is evident the Legislature did not intend to graduate offenses. They had other objects in view, and, except as to them, were careless of the expressions employed. It is evident, too, that the act was penned by a person totally ignorant of technical terms, for he thought capital punishment and corporal punishment were the same. The rule, therefore, which we should lay down, and which is founded on the act of 1777, is this, that in no case where the punishment extends to life, limb, or member can the court, on the acquittal of the defendant, order the prosecutor to pay costs. In all other cases it may be done, if the prosecution should appear to be frivolous or malicious.

Let the prosecutor pay the costs.

Cited: S. v. Cockerham, 23 N.C. 382; Rees v. Williams, 165 N.C. 208,209. *Page 125

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freddie Eugene Owens v. Bryan P. Stirling
Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2024
State v. . Forsyth
1 N.C. 114 (Superior Court of North Carolina, 1799)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 N.C. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lumbrick-nc-1814.