State v. Ludwig
423 So. 2d 932, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22349
Opinion
Our review of the defendant’s motion to dismiss together with the state’s traverse leads us to conclude that there are material disputed facts which, if resolved in the state’s favor, would establish a prima facie case of guilt against the defendant. Accordingly, we hold that the trial court erred by dismissing the information in this case. See State v. Pentecost, 397 So.2d 711 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Ludwig, 423 So. 2d 932, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22349 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
423 So. 2d 932 (State v. Ludwig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Pentecost
397 So. 2d 711 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)