State v. Luckinbill

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Luckinbill

544 S.W.3d 329

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 24, 2018

DocketWD 80287

StatusPublished

This text of 544 S.W.3d 329 (State v. Luckinbill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Luckinbill, 544 S.W.3d 329 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Luckinbill appeals his convictions for first-degree assault and armed criminal action following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Pettis County. Luckinbill argues that the trial court erred in refusing to tender his proposed self-defense instruction to the jury. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James Luckinbill appeals his convictions for first-degree assault and armed criminal action following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Pettis County. Luckinbill argues that the trial court erred in refusing to tender his proposed self-defense instruction to the jury. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

544 S.W.3d 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-luckinbill-moctapp-2018.