State v. Luckinbill

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Luckinbill

544 S.W.3d 329

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 24, 2018·No. WD 80287·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Luckinbill appeals his convictions for first-degree assault and armed criminal action following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Pettis County. Luckinbill argues that the trial court erred in refusing to tender his proposed self-defense instruction to the jury. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James Luckinbill appeals his convictions for first-degree assault and armed criminal action following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Pettis County. Luckinbill argues that the trial court erred in refusing to tender his proposed self-defense instruction to the jury. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Luckinbill, 544 S.W.3d 329 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

544 S.W.3d 329 (State v. Luckinbill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.