State v. Luckett

267 S.W.3d 750, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1135, 2008 WL 3898900
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 26, 2008·No. ED 90483·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Walter Luckett (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance following a bench trial in which he was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance, driving with a revoked license, and failure to display a valid license plate. Defendant contends that the State’s evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that sufficient evidence was present to allow a reasonable fact-finder to find Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Luckett, 267 S.W.3d 750, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1135, 2008 WL 3898900 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

267 S.W.3d 750 (State v. Luckett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Allied Services, LLC
267 S.W.3d 750 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)