State v. Lucas

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Lucas

204 S.E.2d 195, 21 N.C. App. 343, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1800

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedApril 17, 1974

DocketNo. 747SC339

StatusPublished

This text of 204 S.E.2d 195 (State v. Lucas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lucas, 204 S.E.2d 195, 21 N.C. App. 343, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1800 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

The sole assignment of error presented by each defendant is to the entry of judgment against him.

An exception to the judgment presents the face of the record proper for review; and, ordinarily, such review is limited to the questions of whether error of law appears on the face of the record and whether the judgment is regular in form. State v. Shelly, 280 N.C. 300, 185 S.E. 2d 702 (1972); State v. Kirby, 276 N.C. 123, 171 S.E. 2d 416 (1970); State v. Strickland, 10 N.C. App. 540, 179 S.E. 2d 162 (1971).

We have examined the record proper and detect no error in law and the judgments are regular in form. Furthermore, we have reviewed the evidence and conclude that it fully supports the verdicts and the judgments, and the sentences imposed are within the limits prescribed by statute.

No error.

Judges Hedrick and Carson concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI