State v. Lubitz
This text of 2020 ND 219 (State v. Lubitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 10/21/2020 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2020 ND 219
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Ginny Rose Lubitz, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20200118
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable John C. Irby, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Tracy E. Hines, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Russell J. Myhre, Enderlin, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Lubitz No. 20200118
[¶1] Ginny Rose Lubitz appeals after a criminal judgment was entered on a jury verdict finding her guilty of murder. Lubitz argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the guilty verdict and that the district court erred in denying her request for a continuance because the State failed to turn over discovery in a timely manner. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 ND 219, 949 N.W.2d 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lubitz-nd-2020.