State v. Lozier

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Lozier

785 N.E.2d 756, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1501

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 25, 2003

Docket2002-0900

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 785 N.E.2d 756 (State v. Lozier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lozier, 785 N.E.2d 756, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1501 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Holmes App. No. 01CA21, 2002-Ohio-1671. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Holmes County. Upon consideration of the joint motion of appellant and amicus curiae Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro for amicus curiae to participate in oral argument scheduled for April 30, 2003,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes App. No. 01CA21, 2002-Ohio-1671. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Holmes County. Upon consideration of the joint motion of appellant and amicus curiae Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro for amicus curiae to participate in oral argument scheduled for April 30, 2003,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

785 N.E.2d 756, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lozier-ohio-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack