State v. Loza

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided June 8, 2026·No. CA2025-11-102·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY

:

STATE OF OHIO, : CASE NO. CA2025-11-102 Appellee, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

- vs - : 6/8/2026

:

RODRIGO GARCIA LOZA, :

Appellant.

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. 2025CR42385

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kirsten A. Brandt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Johnna M. Shia, for appellant.

DECISION

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by appellant, Rodrigo Garcia Loza, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.

Warren CA2025-11-102

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

BYRNE, P.J., M. POWELL and SIEBERT, JJ., concur.

Warren CA2025-11-102

JUDGMENT ENTRY

The brief of appellant, filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), properly before this court and having been considered by the court, it is ordered that the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to the Warren County Court of Common Pleas for execution upon this judgment and that a certified copy of this Decision and Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.

Costs to be taxed to appellant.

/s/ Matthew R. Byrne, Presiding Judge

/s/ Mike Powell, Judge

/s/ Melena S. Siebert, Judge

NOTICE TO THE CLERK:

Serve a copy of this decision/judgment entry upon appellant at: #A849185, Rodrigo Garcia Loza, Madison Correctional Institution, 884 Coitsville-Hubbard Road, Youngstown, Ohio 44505.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Loza, (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).

State v. Loza (State v. Loza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)