State v. Lowrance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Lowrance

DecidedDecember 3, 2014

Docket2014-UP-439

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Lowrance (State v. Lowrance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lowrance, (S.C. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Patrick Lowrance, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-213300

Appeal From Greenville County Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-439 Heard September 9, 2014 – Filed December 3, 2014

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Patrick Lowrance appeals his conviction for possession of a stolen vehicle, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict because the evidence was insufficient to show the vehicle was stolen. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Lane, 406 S.C. 118, 121, 749 S.E.2d 165, 167 (Ct. App. 2013) ("If there is any direct evidence, or if there is substantial circumstantial evidence, which reasonably tends to prove the defendant's guilt, an appellate court must find the trial court properly submitted the case to the jury."); id. ("On appeal from the denial of a directed verdict, an appellate court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the State.").

AFFIRMED.

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Patrick Lowrance, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-213300

Appeal From Greenville County Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-439 Heard September 9, 2014 – Filed December 3, 2014

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Patrick Lowrance appeals his conviction for possession of a stolen vehicle, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict because the evidence was insufficient to show the vehicle was stolen. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Lane, 406 S.C. 118, 121, 749 S.E.2d 165, 167 (Ct. App. 2013) ("If there is any direct evidence, or if there is substantial circumstantial evidence, which reasonably tends to prove the defendant's guilt, an appellate court must find the trial court properly submitted the case to the jury."); id. ("On appeal from the denial of a directed verdict, an appellate court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the State.").

AFFIRMED.

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Lowrance, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lowrance-scctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack