State v. Lowery
693 P.2d 1343, 71 Or. App. 833, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2443
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 23, 1985·No. B65-863; CA A32678·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The state appeals a trial court judgment dismissing a complaint charging defendant with harassment under ORS 166.065(1)(f),1 on the ground the statute was unconstitutionally vague. Contrary to the view of the trial court, we find the statute clear and unambiguous. Neither do we find merit in any other theory of unconstitutionality advanced by defendant.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Lowery, 693 P.2d 1343, 71 Or. App. 833, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2443 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).
693 P.2d 1343 (State v. Lowery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hibbard
823 P.2d 989 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)