State v. Lowe

124 P.3d 632, 202 Or. App. 717, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1526
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 23, 2005·No. 0306-66610; A123463·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of an order of civil commitment that was entered on the ground that, because of a mental disorder, he is dangerous to himself or others and is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d). He argues that the trial court erred in concluding that the state had proved by clear and convincing evidence that he suffers from a mental disorder and is in need of further treatment. The state concedes that there is not clear and convincing evidence in the record that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is in need of treatment. After reviewing the record, we accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lowe, 124 P.3d 632, 202 Or. App. 717, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1526 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

124 P.3d 632 (State v. Lowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005