State v. Lowe
This text of 124 P.3d 632 (State v. Lowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of an order of civil commitment that was entered on the ground that, because of a mental disorder, he is dangerous to himself or others and is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d). He argues that the trial court erred in concluding that the state had proved by clear and convincing evidence that he suffers from a mental disorder and is in need of further treatment. The state concedes that there is not clear and convincing evidence in the record that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is in need of treatment. After reviewing the record, we accept the state’s concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 P.3d 632, 202 Or. App. 717, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lowe-orctapp-2005.