State v. Lowe

201 S.E.2d 90, 20 N.C. App. 186, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1508
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 12, 1973
DocketNo. 7319SC785
StatusPublished

This text of 201 S.E.2d 90 (State v. Lowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lowe, 201 S.E.2d 90, 20 N.C. App. 186, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1508 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

BALEY, Judge.

Defendant has assigned as error the failure of the trial court to grant his motion for nonsuit. It is clear that there is substantial evidence to justify submission of this case to the jury and to support its verdict.

The State’s evidence included the testimony of Mrs. Teresa Tilley, the granddaughter of Mrs. Myrtle Wills, who testified [187]*187that she participated with defendant in the theft on 29 April 1972. She stated that she was unmarried at that time and had been dating defendant. Defendant told her that she would have to “come up with some money” to pay a bill he owed, and she said that her grandmother kept some money in the bathroom. Defendant then told her to help him steal the money or he would kill her. She went to her grandmother’s house and entered by using a rock to break the glass in the front door. She telephoned defendant, and he came to the house, pried open the safe in the bathroom where Mrs. Wills kept her money, and emptied the money into some paper bags. Defendant then left to get a car, and when he returned Teresa Tilley took the bags of money and the stereo out to the car and they drove off. They went to a building owned by Rich Tilley, where they counted the money and placed it in two cookie cans, and then they resumed driving. After they had driven for some time they were stopped by police officers and arrested.

Defendant contends that Mrs. Tilley’s testimony was incompetent since she was an accomplice in the crime, but this contention is without merit. The testimony of an accomplice is sufficient to sustain a conviction even when unsupported by other evidence. State v. McNair, 272 N.C. 130, 157 S.E. 2d 660; State v. Terrell, 256 N.C. 232, 123 S.E. 2d 469; State v. Kendrick, 9 N.C. App. 688, 177 S.E. 2d 345. Here, however, there was a great deal of evidence in addition to that of Mrs. Tilley. Mrs. J. W. Givens, a neighbor of Mrs. Wills, testified that she saw Teresa Tilley using a rock to break into Mrs. Wills’ front door. She saw defendant going into the house and then coming out and returning with a car, and she saw Mrs. Tilley coming out of the house and getting into the car with her arms full. H. E. Tucker, a Kannapolis policeman, testified that he stopped defendant and Teresa Tilley and found a stereo and two cans full of money in their car. Mrs. Wills stated that when she came home from work during the morning of 29 April 1972, she found that her front door had been broken, her stereo was missing, and her safe had been broken open and the money removed.

Motion for nonsuit is properly denied when there is substantial evidence tending to prove the essential elements of the crime with which defendant is charged. State v. Evans, 279 N.C. 447, 183 S.E. 2d 540; State v. Allred, 279 N.C. 398, 183 S.E. 2d 553; State v. Vestal, 278 N.C. 561, 180 S.E. 2d 755.

[188]*188Defendant has received a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Britt and Parker concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. McNair
157 S.E.2d 660 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
State v. Vestal
180 S.E.2d 755 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Terrell
123 S.E.2d 469 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
State v. Kendrick
177 S.E.2d 345 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)
State v. Allred
183 S.E.2d 553 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Evans
183 S.E.2d 540 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 S.E.2d 90, 20 N.C. App. 186, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lowe-ncctapp-1973.