State v. Love

South Dakota Supreme Court

State v. Love

282 N.W.2d 73, 1979 S.D. LEXIS 274

South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1979·No. No. 12555·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State has attempted to appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of charges alleging that defendant had violated the provisions of SDCL 22-23-8 by paying for the transportation of a person into the State of South Dakota for the purpose of engaging in prostitution and by transporting a person into this state for the purpose of engaging in prostitution.

We conclude that in the light of our decisions in State v. Texley, 275 N.W.2d 872 (S.D.1979), and State v. Nuwi Nini, 262 N.W.2d 758 (S.D.1978), we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State has attempted to appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of charges alleging that defendant had violated the provisions of SDCL 22-23-8 by paying for the transportation of a person into the State of South Dakota for the purpose of engaging in prostitution and by transporting a person into this state for the purpose of engaging in prostitution.

We conclude that in the light of our decisions in State v. Texley, 275 N.W.2d 872 (S.D.1979), and State v. Nuwi Nini, 262 N.W.2d 758 (S.D.1978), we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

State v. Love, 282 N.W.2d 73, 1979 S.D. LEXIS 274 (S.D. 1979).

Pincite

282 N.W.2d 73 (State v. Love) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related