State v. Love

52 Mo. 106
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided February 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Adams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an indictment under the statute concerning false pretenses. A demurrer was sustained to the indictment, but no final judgment was rendered on the demurrer. In[107] stead of rendering final judgment the court ordered the defendant into custody to abide the further action of the grand jury then in session.

There being no final judgment, the appeal will be dismissed. (See State vs. Gregory, 38 Mo., 501 ; 2 W. S., 1114, § 14; State vs. Martindale, 51 Mo., decided February Term, 1873.)

Appeal dismissed.

The other judges concur.

THE END OK KEBRUARY TEEM 1873, AT ST. JOSEPH.

[108] OASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE -STATE OF MISSOURI. MARCH TERM, 18*73, AT ST. LOUIS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Love, 52 Mo. 106 (Mo. 1873).

52 Mo. 106 (State v. Love) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rosenblatt
83 S.W. 975 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1904)