State v. Loupe

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Loupe

578 So. 2d 928, 1991 La. LEXIS 1133, 1991 WL 67754

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 2, 1991

DocketNo. 90-KH-2608

StatusPublished

This text of 578 So. 2d 928 (State v. Loupe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Loupe, 578 So. 2d 928, 1991 La. LEXIS 1133, 1991 WL 67754 (La. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Loupe, Morgan; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Avoyelles, 12th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 67354, 67355; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW90-0698.

Denied. Relator should renew his requests for the October 16, 1989 initial incident reports to the Avoyelles Parish Sheriff’s Office in Marksville (Attention: Major Lemoine) and the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries enforcement Section (Attention: Col. Winton Vidrine), P 0 Box 9800, Baton Rouge, La. 70898-9000. If relator does not receive a prompt response, either in the form of the requested report or a cost estimate apprising him of the amount he must remit to obtain a copy of the report, he is free to renew his petition in this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Loupe, Morgan; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Avoyelles, 12th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 67354, 67355; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW90-0698.

Denied. Relator should renew his requests for the October 16, 1989 initial incident reports to the Avoyelles Parish Sheriff’s Office in Marksville (Attention: Major Lemoine) and the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries enforcement Section (Attention: Col. Winton Vidrine), P 0 Box 9800, Baton Rouge, La. 70898-9000. If relator does not receive a prompt response, either in the form of the requested report or a cost estimate apprising him of the amount he must remit to obtain a copy of the report, he is free to renew his petition in this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 So. 2d 928, 1991 La. LEXIS 1133, 1991 WL 67754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-loupe-la-1991.