State v. Loud, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2005)
This text of 2005 Ohio 6553 (State v. Loud, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2005)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, James Loud, Jr., has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California
(1967),
{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
Powell, P.J., Walsh and Bressler, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2005 Ohio 6553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-loud-unpublished-decision-12-12-2005-ohioctapp-2005.