State v. Loucks

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Loucks

359 S.W.3d 566, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 255, 2012 WL 612479

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 2012·No. No. WD 73686·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Loucks appeals from his conviction on one count of second-degree child molestation. He contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because there was inconsistent and contradictory testimony about the details and circumstances surrounding the act. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Loucks appeals from his conviction on one count of second-degree child molestation. He contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because there was inconsistent and contradictory testimony about the details and circumstances surrounding the act. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Loucks, 359 S.W.3d 566, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 255, 2012 WL 612479 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

359 S.W.3d 566 (State v. Loucks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.