State v. Loubier

539 A.2d 216, 1988 Me. LEXIS 103
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedApril 5, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 539 A.2d 216 (State v. Loubier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Loubier, 539 A.2d 216, 1988 Me. LEXIS 103 (Me. 1988).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

The defendant, Mark V. Loubier, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Aroostook County, entered after a jury verdict finding him guilty of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or with excessive alcohol in his blood, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Supp. 1987). Loubier’s sole contention on appeal is that the State failed to make an adequate in-court identification of him at trial. The record in this case reveals that the defendant was adequately identified by the State’s witness, so as to allow the jury to be convinced of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See State v. Guptill, 481 A.2d 772, 775 (Me.1984).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Guptill
481 A.2d 772 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 A.2d 216, 1988 Me. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-loubier-me-1988.