State v. LOTTS

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. LOTTS

351 S.W.3d 858, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1436, 2011 WL 5187297

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 1, 2011

DocketED 95422

StatusPublished

This text of 351 S.W.3d 858 (State v. LOTTS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. LOTTS, 351 S.W.3d 858, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1436, 2011 WL 5187297 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darel Lotts appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of murder in the first degree, assault in the first degree, and two counts of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darel Lotts appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of murder in the first degree, assault in the first degree, and two counts of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

351 S.W.3d 858, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1436, 2011 WL 5187297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lotts-moctapp-2011.