Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Lott

State v. Lott

823 P.2d 1041, 111 Or. App. 394, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 331
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 12, 1992
DocketC90-04-32163; CA A67071
StatusPublished

This text of 823 P.2d 1041 (State v. Lott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lott, 823 P.2d 1041, 111 Or. App. 394, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 331 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of possession and delivery of controlled substances as part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network. He demurred to the indictment on the ground that the scheme or network language is unconstitutionally vague. However, on appeal, he challenges only the sentence imposed. The state concedes, by letter, that the sentence is improper. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991). We accept that concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Moeller
806 P.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State v. Moeller
815 P.2d 701 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
823 P.2d 1041, 111 Or. App. 394, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lott-orctapp-1992.