State v. Lott

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Lott

802 N.E.2d 1126, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1451

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 6, 2004

Docket1989-0846

StatusPublished

This text of 802 N.E.2d 1126 (State v. Lott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lott, 802 N.E.2d 1126, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1451 (Ohio 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 54537. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to set execution date,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to set execution date be, and hereby is, held in abeyance pending a ruling by the court of appeals on the case pending there.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the parties are to notify this court when the proceedings before the court of appeals have concluded.

Resnick, J., would grant the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 54537. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to set execution date,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to set execution date be, and hereby is, held in abeyance pending a ruling by the court of appeals on the case pending there.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the parties are to notify this court when the proceedings before the court of appeals have concluded.

Resnick, J., would grant the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

802 N.E.2d 1126, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lott-ohio-2004.