State v. Lotegano

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Lotegano

173 A. 136, 113 N.J.L. 176, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 354

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJune 21, 1934

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 173 A. 136 (State v. Lotegano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lotegano, 173 A. 136, 113 N.J.L. 176, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 354 (N.J. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by

Parker, J.

The case is submitted on briefs. The brief for plaintiff in error bears the name of a member of the bar who is a counselor-at-law, but who signs simply as attorney of record. Apart from this, we have not found it necessary, nor indeed possible, to go into the merits, because the case does not show any judgment of the Supreme Court, nor any writ of error out of this court, nor any assignment of error in this court.

Consequently there is nothing for us to review; and the writ of error — if there be one — is accordingly dismissed.

For dismissal — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI